Maryland's
High Ranking in Anti-Tobacco Spending Jeopardized by Budget Cuts
By Luciana Lopez
Capital News Service
Thursday, Jan. 23, 2003 WASHINGTON - Maryland is one of only four
states that meet federal guidelines for spending on programs to stop or
prevent smoking, according to a report released Wednesday by a coalition of
health groups.
But those funds would be almost cut in half under Gov. Robert Ehrlich's
fiscal 2004 budget as the state struggles to close a $1.7 billion shortfall.
Health advocates call the cuts short-sighted, but administration officials
say they have little choice.
"The state is broke," said Shareese DeLeaver, a spokeswoman for the
governor. Maryland is in "in a tough fiscal crunch, and tough choices had to
be made," she said.
Maryland currently spends $30 million on anti-tobacco programs, barely
within Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines that suggest
the state should spend between $30.3 million and $78.6 million a year.
Ehrlich's budget would cut state funding of tobacco cessation and
prevention programs to $15.2 million for the fiscal year starting July 1.
Health advocates said they fear cuts like Maryland's could happen
nationally, as other states struggle to close budget gaps.
"We expect there to be continued pressure, because many states have
budget deficits, to use their tobacco revenues to solve their deficit
problems," said Bill Corr, vice president for the Campaign for Tobacco-Free
Kids.
But Corr said cutting prevention measures "saves a little bit of money in
this fiscal year, but it just costs you a lot more later" in health care
costs.
Maryland garners about $444 million a year in tobacco taxes and in
payments from the national settlement of a lawsuit by the states against
tobacco companies, according to the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.
The current $30 million budget is a sharp increase from the last fiscal
year, when a dispute over attorneys' fees held tobacco program spending to
about $20 million.
In the current fiscal year, about $14 million is going to local health
campaigns and another $10 million is going to Smoking Stops Here, the media
campaign launched in July 2002, said Carlessia Hussein, executive director
of the state's Cigarette Restitution Fund Program.
But those programs would both be scaled back under Ehrlich's budget, and
some hoped-for additions would be scrapped entirely, like the creation of a
"quit line," a toll-free number that smokers could call to get immediate
advice about how to quit smoking.
The report on states' spending was released by the Campaign for Tobacco-
Free Kids, American Heart Association, American Cancer Society, American
Lung Association and the SmokeLess States National Tobacco Policy
Initiative.
The report showed an overall decrease in anti-tobacco spending by states,
leading the American Cancer Society's Michael Schwartzberg to warn that,
"Cancer cuts kill."
Ehrlich's budget still must be approved by the General Assembly, but
lawmakers can only cut or shift funds in the governor's budget, they cannot
add to it.
"Everything is in flux at this point, and a lot of it depends on whether
or not they can find the money" to make up the shortfall, said Sen. Ida
Ruben, D-Montgomery. "I suspect they (administration officials) are looking
for every bit of money they can because they don't want to raise taxes."
Ruben, who sits on the Budget and Taxation Committee, would not predict
whether the proposed cuts would hold, but agreed with advocates that
shifting money away from prevention could problematic in the future.
The state will "pay double" in the long term, she said. "There is no free
lunch."
Copyright ©
2003 University of Maryland College of Journalism
Top of Page | Home Page
|