Bartlett vs.
Rolle: More on the Issues
By Daina Klimanis
Maryland Newsline
Friday, Feb. 27, 2004
In a primary campaign where both candidates value
small government and national security, it can be hard to pick out the
differences between them. However, Frederick County State’s Attorney Scott Rolle and six-term incumbent Roscoe Bartlett do have different stances on
several issues.
International Relations
Rolle has taken a hard-line
stance on the Iraq war, criticizing his opponent for seeking U.N.
support for the invasion. Saddam Hussein was a threat to U.S. national
security, Rolle said, and the United States should have taken him on without worrying
about other nations.
“When it comes to national
security, we should not sell out U.S. sovereignty to the U.N.,” Rolle said.
Bartlett supported the Iraq
war even after it became clear the U.S. was not going to gain U.N. approval,
but he was interested in seeking international support, Bartlett Campaign
Manager Sallie Taylor said.
“He did not want it to appear
that it was the U.S.A. against the Muslim world,” Taylor said.
On other issues, Bartlett has
spoken against U.N. involvement in this country’s affairs. He has
co-sponsored several bills that would limit international influence on U.S.
affairs, including a bill expressing disagreement with the International
Criminal Court.
The War on Terrorism
Rolle said government
employees need to be better equipped to respond to terrorism. He wants to
increase financial support for emergency personnel, who would be first to
respond after a terrorist attack, and keep in place the legislation that
increases the powers of law enforcement officers, like the USA PATRIOT Act.
The act increased federal law
enforcement investigative powers in terrorism cases. It gives them broad
search and surveillance powers as well as access to personal and business
information.
Though concerned about a few
of the provisions in the act, including one allowing the government to
monitor computer use in public libraries, Rolle said he would vote to renew
the act.
“We must do everything to
protect our families and our children, and this is a good start,” Rolle
said.
Bartlett voted for the USA PATRIOT Act,
but he is concerned with the
erosion of civil liberties that has accompanied the quest for security,
Taylor said.
“If we curb our civil
liberties, then the terrorists will have won,” Taylor said. “If you give up
more and more of your liberties, you have less and less security.”
Bartlett will have to see the
text of the USA PATRIOT Act renewal before deciding whether to support it,
Taylor said.
Education
Rolle and Bartlett both think
local government should have the final say in curriculum.
However, unlike Bartlett, Rolle said the federal government can play a
significant role in education by setting standards.
Rolle supports the No Child
Left Behind Act, which he said requires schools to invest in educating their
students and then show results for the money received. He has criticized
Bartlett for rejecting the No Child Left Behind Act and the federal funding
that comes with it.
Enacted in 2002, the act
seeks to improve schools through teacher certification requirements and
annual student testing. Schools in which students do not meet federal
standards must provide tutoring or let students transfer to other schools;
if they do not improve, they face financial penalties.
Bartlett maintained that
broad federal mandates, such at the act, do not serve students best. They
create bureaucracy, Taylor said; schools controlled by local officials and
parents can better meet educational needs.
Health Care
Both candidates support
market-based health care solutions, including tax-free health savings
accounts designed to make paying for medical care easier. However, Rolle takes the market-based solutions tack further than Bartlett, who voted
for the Prescription Drug Coverage for Seniors bill Congress passed in
November.
Bartlett supported the bill
because he believed the market changes it would affect would make health
care more affordable for everyone, Taylor said. In addition, he was pleased
by the way the bill sent more funds to rural hospitals.
He does think Congress may
need to go back to the bill and trim its massive appropriations, Taylor
said.
By contrast, Rolle said he
would not have supported such a costly solution, which he said will cause
the deficit to balloon. The White House budget recently estimated the bill
to cost $534 billion from 2004 to 2013, up from the
November estimate of $395 billion.
“Instead of increasing our
deficit, let’s try something new and exciting,” Rolle said. “Let’s use our
bargaining power.”
The government should take
advantage of its tremendous buying power and pressure drug companies to
lower costs, Rolle said.
Campaign finance reform
Both candidates support some
measure of the campaign finance reform law enacted in 2002. Designed to
limit the influence of money on politics, the law limited uncontrolled
donations to political parties, called soft money.
“I don’t like to see
elections bought and paid for by special interests," Rolle said.
Nevertheless, Rolle said the
law, which also changed limits on donations and created new finance
reporting requirements, violated the First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech.
Multi-person political
players should be regulated instead of individuals, Rolle said.
“Corporations, special
interest groups and PACs are the ones we need to keep in check," Rolle
said.
Though Bartlett does not
oppose restricting donation sizes, he did not vote for the 2002 bill because
of a provision banning ads that name a candidate in the days before an
election, Wright said. He has sponsored legislation to repeal that
provision.
Gay Marriage
Both candidates said they
believe marriage is an act that can only happen between a man and a woman,
and steps need to be taken to preserve the act's sanctity. But Bartlett is
more eager to support a constitutional amendment – he signed on to
co-sponsor the president's proposed amendment on the same it was proposed.
"We’ve ratified the
Constitution by amendments now 27 times," Bartlett said in a press release.
"I’m very happy with the hope that this will be the 28th Amendment to the
Constitution.”
Though Rolle wants to see
marriage defined, he does not think a constitutional amendment is necessary
unless the courts do not first succeed in halting gay marriages.
“If we start seeing this as a
trend about this country and the way to protect marriage is through a
constitutional amendment, I would support it," he said.
Death Penalty
Rolle said he brings his 13
years as a public prosecutor to bear when he considers the death penalty. He approves of the current system. He would also like to see the punishment
extended to people who commit terrorist acts and to people who sexually
assault children.
By contrast, Bartlett opposes
the death penalty. Not only is the expensive procedure ineffective as a
deterrent, but it is administered more often to the poor and minorities, said
Bartlett's press secretary.
But Bartlett primarily
opposes the death penalty on the belief that government should avoid taking
a person's life.
"The congressman
believes in the protection of life across the spectrum," Wright said. "He
believes society is coarsened if the government kills criminals rather than
protecting society from them by imprisoning them for life.”
Energy
Rolle said he wants to reduce
the country's dependence on foreign oil. One way to do this would be to
allow oil drilling in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge, a measure he said
he supports.
Though Bartlett has the same
goal of increasing the country's energy self-sufficiency, he opposes
immediate Alaska drilling because he wants to save the oil reserves for the
future, Wright said.
"It’s penny wise and pound
foolish to go out and use what little oil we know that we might have
thinking that today is a rainy day when there will surely be a rainier day,"
Wright said. "He (Bartlett) would husband that resource.”
Bartlett advocates developing
nonfossil-fuel energy sources, including ethanol and biomass energy, and
he has introduced legislation that would fund fuel research, Taylor said.
He has also obtained funding
for a Western Maryland welcome center at I-270 Byron Overlook that would be
largely energy self-sufficient, Wright said. Bartlett drives a
Toyota Prius hybrid gas-electric car.
Traffic
Throughout his terms,
Bartlett has pushed for funds for traffic improvements throughout his
district, “from Garrett County on down,” Taylor said. Some of the traffic
projects that received attention during his time in office include the
I-270, I-70 and Route 85 corridors, which received tens of millions of
dollars, Taylor said.
Bartlett will continue
pursuing funds throughout his district as necessary, Taylor said, guided by
the realistic understanding of how much the state will contribute. If the
state won’t match the federal funds, it isn’t worth trying for the federal
funds in the first place, she said.
Rolle has a few
specific plans. He wants to secure the funds to widen I-270, and he has
criticized Bartlett for not doing more to widen the road.
“We're in love with our cars,
and we’re not going to give them up, so we have to find solutions to get
them where they’re going to go,” said campaign volunteer Bill Rolle, who is
Scott Rolle’s father.
Candidate Rolle also wants to
improve the MARC train system as an alternate to road transportation. Not
only did he say he wanted to make the schedule more widely available, make
the routes more direct and extend the train operation hours into the
weekend, but he said he would ride it himself.
“If I end up working in D.C., you'll see me on the
train often,” Rolle said.
On other
significant issues, especially in economic matters, the two candidates are
in agreement.
Taxes
Both candidates have vowed to
maintain tax cuts. Bartlett received a 95 percent rating from the Americans
for Tax Reform in 2002 for his support of low taxes and small government.
Rolle has also promised to
keep taxes low, which he said is necessary to stimulate the economy and cut
back on government waste. "Let people keep as much of
their money as possible," he said.
Small Businesses
Both candidates have vowed to
make the district more attractive to small businesses by reducing their
burden of taxes and regulation.
Bartlett is the president of
the House Small Business Committee and has fought to end taxes that affect
small businesses, Taylor said.
These efforts have netted him
the Guardian of Small Business Award from the National Federation of
Independent Businesses each term he’s served.
Rolle counters that Bartlett
has not done enough for small businesses because too many burdensome
regulations still exist in the district. After conversations with business
owners, he said, he has realized the area has many regulations that serve as
“brick walls” to starting new businesses.
He also said he would reduce
barriers to business and serve as an ambassador for the region, traveling
the country to court businesses to locate in the district.
Immigration
Both candidates say are
against President Bush’s immigration policy, which would give employed
immigrants temporary guest-worker status, allowing them to stay in the
country legally even if they entered illegally.
“Although Scott supports the
president on many issues, this is one issue where he differs,” said
John Tomaszewski, media coordinator for the Rolle campaign.
Rolle considers adequate
border control a national security issue, Tomaszewski said.
Bartlett’s campaign manager
was singing a similar tune. “Bartlett thinks we should
protect our borders,” Taylor said. “He was one of the few congressmen to
sign a letter to George Bush expressing reservations about his immigration
plan.”
Both candidates also oppose
accepting matricula consular cards, issued by the government of Mexico, as
valid identification. Unlike identification issued by the U.S. government,
the cards do not require someone to prove they are in the
country legally.
“We have so many people who
have followed the rules to get into this country -- it’s insulting to them,”
Taylor said.
Abortion
Both candidates think
abortion should be legal only in cases of rape or incest, or when the
mother’s life is in danger.
Rolle said that as an
adoptive parent, he has a special interest in the matter. "I’m an adoptive parent, so
I’d like do things to not only encourage adoption, but to make it easier and
quicker," he said. "This is the option we should be pursuing."
Gun Control
Both candidates believe the
Second Amendment guarantees the right to individual gun ownership and oppose
gun control.
"The district I come from has
many sportsmen, hunters, outdoorsmen, collectors, and they certainly have
the right to do that based on the Constitution," Rolle said.
Bartlett is critical of gun
control's effectiveness.
“What
Bartlett often says is, if gun control worked, then the District of Columbia
would be one of the safest places in the world, instead of having one of the
highest murder rates," Wright said.
Copyright ©
2004 University of Maryland Philip Merrill College of
Journalism
Top of Page | Home Page
|