From the CNS
Archive:
Maryland General Assembly OKs Lobbyist-Lawmaker Business Disclosure
By Chris Frates
Capital News Service
Thursday, April
06, 2000
ANNAPOLIS - A bill requiring lobbyists to disclose business
transactions with lawmakers passed the Maryland General Assembly
Thursday, but critics said it's not inclusive enough and called it a
"feel good" measure.
The proposal was one of two introduced this session by Senate
President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr., D-Prince George's, and House Speaker
Casper Taylor Jr., D-Allegany, after Delegate Tony Fulton, D-Baltimore,
and lobbyist Gerard Evans were indicted in December for an elaborate mail
and wire fraud scheme.
The leaders also offered a ban on lobbyist-lawmaker business
relationships over $500, but that measure failed.
Miller had no comment on the bill's passage.
Under the bill, lobbyists are required to report business transactions
worth at least $1,000 or a series of transactions worth at least $5,000
within a six-month period with lawmakers and top state officials - adding
to an already long list of State Ethics Commission reporting
requirements.
"I believe in full disclosure," said Greg Costa, a National Rifle
Association lobbyist. "Everyone should disclose. I think this whole town
is a paragon of integrity. I think full disclosure should be easy."
Sen. Michael Collins, D-Baltimore County, who led debate in the
Senate, said the bill was "a very modest" step.
He originally asked leadership to await recommendations of the
lobbyist ethics taskforce, of which he is a member, before passing any
bills. The task force, appointed by the Legislature, is expected to
report in September.
But, Collins said, Miller asked him for support and he wasn't going to
spend political capital fighting it.
However, some did fight.
Sen. Richard Colburn, R-Dorchester, tried to amend the bill to include
governmental lobbyists. State and local government representatives aren't
required to register with the State Ethics Commission when pushing
legislative initiatives.
The state, especially the governor, uses taxpayer money to lobby
legislators to vote for administration initiatives, Colburn said. He was
referring to funding promises Gov. Parris N. Glendening made to
legislators in exchange for support on Glendening's controversial
gun-control bill.
"If you're trying to buy votes with corporate or business money or
taxpayer dollars, what's the difference? You're still trying to buy
votes," he said.
Colburn's amendment failed and the bill went on to pass the Senate
40-5. It passed the House March 24, 125-10.
While the bill's passage is a good step forward, Maryland Common
Cause, a public watchdog, wanted a broader bill, said Kathleen Skullney,
executive director.
Like Colburn, she said she wanted governmental as well as corporate
agencies included. Under the bill, disclosure is only required of
individual lobbyists.
For example, while both Skullney, as an individual, and Maryland
Common Cause, as an organization, are registered lobbyists only Skullney
would have to disclose business transactions, she said.
Banning business relationships over $500, as the leadership's other
bill did, is a more complicated issue, Skullney said.
"A blanket prohibition is a very difficult approach at best," she
said.
Now that the General Assembly has approved disclosure, Collins said he
wondered whether the Legislature would have any interest in passing a
ban, even though the task force will consider such a measure in May.
Legislative leaders originally planned to wait for the task force's
recommendations before drafting any ethics legislation. But after the
indictments of Fulton and Evans, the measures moved forward.
The men are charged with 11 counts of mail and wire fraud in what the
grand jury said was a scheme to defraud Evans' lobbying clients. Fulton,
who is a real estate agent, was also paid $10,125 for finding Evans'
lobbying firm a new Annapolis office.
Copyright © 2001 University of Maryland College of
Journalism
Top of Page | Home Page
|