Delegates, Governor
Unveil Different Approaches to Slot Machines By Stephanie Tracy and Adrienne
Saunders
Capital News
Service Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2004
ANNAPOLIS - Legislators set the stage for a new round in the fight over
expanded gambling Tuesday as Gov. Robert Ehrlich Jr. and the House of Delegates
presented separate proposals for slot machine approval.
Ehrlich sent his revised slots bill to the General Assembly late Monday
night, to the surprise and irritation of some lawmakers.
Tuesday afternoon, the House Ways and Means Committee answered the governor's
salvo with the release of its months-long study of gambling in Maryland and its
effect on the state's economic and social well being.
Although he had not seen the details of the governor's bill, House Speaker
Michael E. Busch, D-Anne Arundel, said the proposal sounded a familiar tune.
"From my understanding it's a very similar proposal to last year's except
with a few expansions," he said. "We'll put the House study and the governor's
proposal side-by-side and take a realistic approach from there."
The governor is proposing off-track slot machine venues in Prince George's,
Howard, Harford, Cecil, Baltimore and/or Baltimore City. A commission would
decide where to locate gambling sites within each eligible jurisdiction. The
plan limits the number of off-track video lottery terminals to 4,000.
Ehrlich said in a press release that his proposal recognized a "growing
consensus" among lawmakers to allow slots at non-racetrack locations.
"I look forward to working with elected officials across Maryland toward a
consensus that helps fund our K-12 classrooms and stops the flow of Maryland
dollars across state lines," he said.
Like the slots legislation that passed the Senate last session, the
administration's proposal would also authorize licenses for slot machines at
Pimlico, Laurel Park and Rosecroft Raceway, as well as an anticipated track in
Allegany County. Gambling machines at all the included racetracks could total
more than 11,000 terminals.
Racetrack slots revenue would be distributed as defined in the slots bill
from the 2003 General Assembly session. Education funding would receive 46
percent of the slots proceeds, and each racetrack would receive 39 percent. The
rest would be divided among affected local and state governments. The new
proposal sends $250,000 to health benefits for Maryland jockeys.
House Majority Leader Kumar Barve, D-Montgomery, called the proposal vague.
"It's a vehicle for negotiation," Barve said. "We're always willing to work
with the governor, and we really need to see what the Senate does with it. The
House will be heavily guided by the findings of the Ways and Means Committee
report -- that will be our gold standard."
The House report called for public financing for the construction of gambling
facilities and recommended that such facilities be located closer to major
thoroughfares, not residential areas, including the Interstate 95 corridor
between Baltimore and Delaware, the Frederick region between West Virginia and
Maryland's metro areas, and the Eastern Shore.
The delegates' proposal also called for a reduction in the amount of revenue
given to the tracks, 24.8 percent of the gross revenue, instead of the
governor's 39 percent.
Of the administration's proposal, Sen. Nathaniel McFadden, D-Baltimore, said
he would only consider it based on two conditions -- education and the share of
ownership given to minority business owners.
"I've been pressured very strongly by the faith community -- which is largely
against slots -- so if I'm going to support this proposal," McFadden said, "it's
going to be for our children and for the sake of economic parity."
Copyright ©
2004 University of Maryland Philip Merrill College of
Journalism
Top of Page | Home Page
|