ANNAPOLIS - The battle over control of 11 failing Baltimore
schools may have ended in Annapolis, but there still could be some
collateral damage.
Officials of school districts across the state, though they were
largely on the sidelines during the fractious fight over city
schools, are now facing the possibility that they stand to lose
federal aid used to serve underprivileged students.
Before the Senate voted to overturn a veto of legislation placing
a one-year moratorium on state intervention on behalf of Baltimore
schools, state and federal education officials warned that the U.S.
Department of Education could withhold grants - now totaling
close to $171 million - that are distributed to all 24
jurisdictions.
Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr., D-Southern Maryland,
dismissed the warning at the time as "right-wing malarkey" from a
Republican administration getting an early start on the coming
elections.
"They're not going to take money away from schools," Miller said.
"They just want to keep Mayor O'Malley subjugated."
Baltimore Mayor Martin O'Malley is a leading gubernatorial
candidate.
No matter the motivations behind the warning, local schools
officials are left waiting to see if the Bush administration was
simply bluffing in an effort to help a Republican, Gov. Robert L.
Ehrlich, avoid a political defeat.
"We are disappointed by the result and will continue to review
the department's options under No Child Left Behind," Chad Colby,
spokesman for the U.S. Department of Education, said in an e-mail
about the General Assembly action in blocking state intervention in
Baltimore.
A letter from the Department of Education to State Superintendent
of Schools Nancy S. Grasmick on April 5 said that a state
educational agency "that does not, or cannot, carry out its
statutory responsibilities, particularly with respect to the
accountability provisions that are central to the success of NCLB
(No Child Left Behind), would be subject to potential enforcement
actions, including the withholding of funds."
Colby declined to comment on the likelihood that the department
would act on the warning since the veto override.
William Reinhard,
spokesman for the Maryland State Department of Education, said state
officials are working with the federal government and are
not sure when the issue is going to be resolved.
"It really has national consequences," he noted.
The local - and more immediate - consequences could be dire. Edie
House, director of communications for the Baltimore City Public
School System said the system received around $54.5 million last
year of the close to $171 million Title I grants allocated, the
highest in the state.
Other top jurisdictions include Prince George's with close to $29
million, Baltimore County with close to $20 million and Montgomery
with around $19 million.
Kent County public schools were allocated close to half a million
dollars - the lowest amount in the state.
Anne Arundel County was
allotted close to $2.8 million, according to information from the
U.S. Department of Education.
The information on grants from the federal agency represents the
amount allocated to each jurisdiction by the federal government. The
actual amount received by the local systems "will be smaller,"
according to notations in the data table.
A spokesman for Ehrlich said he did not think that any local
school official had contacted the governor to express concerns over
the possibility of withheld funds.
According to House, the Baltimore City system is not worried.
"We are going to stand on the interpretation of the attorney
general," she said.
Maryland Attorney General J. Joseph Curran Jr. said in a letter
April 4 that federal funds are not jeopardized by the legislation
because it does not "impair the state's ability to carry out its
responsibilities." The state board can pursue other courses of
action under state and federal law, he writes.
Curran is a Democrat and the father-in-law of O'Malley.
Brian Edwards, director of the public information office for
Montgomery County Public Schools, said the system is "not going to
engage in speculation" about whether it will see a reduction in
federal funds.
School officials that could be reached this week repeatedly
echoed this hesitation, but also emphasized that these funds are
critical to each system.
Title I grants are determined by the number of students in the
free and reduced-price meal program in each system.
The U.S. Department of Education released an allocation estimate
for next year in early March. The state is slated to receive around
$172.5 million, but the final allocations will not be announced
until May.
The funding determination aligns "with research that that poverty
is the most critical factor in terms of student achievement," said
Allyn Watson, Title I supervisor for Harford County Public Schools.
Harford received $3.6 million last year, she noted.
Watson said the system uses the money to hire additional
resources and staff in schools with a high percentage of
underprivileged students. They hire reading and math specialists,
for instance, she said. Watson said she hates "to make predictions"
about what will happen with the aid, but notes "there is no way
anyone is winning."
Copyright ©
2006 University of Maryland Philip Merrill College of
Journalism
Top of Page | Home Page